若以生存為首要目標，那麼擴大敵對範圍就是極高風險的行為。但從德黑蘭的角度看，顯示軟弱的克制可能同樣危險。
I’ve spent the past few days asking AI companies to convince me that the prospects for AI safety have not dimmed. Just a few years ago, it seemed that there was universal agreement among companies, legislators, and the general public that serious regulation and oversight of AI was not just necessary, but inevitable. People speculated about international bodies setting rules to insure that AI would be treated more seriously than other emerging technologies, and that could at least provide obstacles to its most dangerous implementations. Corporations vowed to prioritize safety over competition and profits. While doomers still spun dystopic scenarios, a global consensus was forming to limit AI risks while reaping its benefits.
。关于这个话题，PDF资料提供了深入分析
[&:first-child]:overflow-hidden [&:first-child]:max-h-full"。业内人士推荐PDF资料作为进阶阅读
Davos talked about brain health this year in a way it never has before. The harder work of broadening those conversations from health ministries to include finance ministries, CEOs, insurance and pension fund boardrooms, and corporate and national AI strategies is what comes next. The question is whether enough people inside boardrooms and national cabinet positions understand what is at stake.，更多细节参见PDF资料